Your editorial (“The new guidance respects human dignity”, 21 February) deserves recognition for promoting respect for human dignity within a frequently contentious debate and highlighting this aspect of the new guidance on relationships and sex education.
However, as the guidance says, “the concept of gender identity … is highly contested”. Producing commentary that seeks to balance truth with human dignity is like navigating a minefield. When language obscures reality, pursuing truth becomes impossible. Two aspects of the editorial warrant further consideration.
The use of the term “gender assigned at birth” – which originated from the physical observation of rare intersex cases but has since been appropriated for ideological purposes – suggests agreement with the strong activist position that gender identity is innate. However, the editorial’s reference to factors that contradict this belief suggests that such agreement may not have been intended.
Get Instant Access
Register for free to read this article in full
Subscribe for unlimited access
From just £37.50 quarterly
Print copy of The Tablet delivered directly to your door.
Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
Access to the weekly digital copy of The Tablet.
Full access to The Tablet’s archive – over 180 years of back issues.

Already a subscriber? Login

MOST READ ARTICLES
1
Battling confession fatigue
2
Nicaraguan bishops visit Rome as Ortega regime tightens grip
3
Would the Church miss us?
4
Vatican confirms Pope’s Latin America travel plans despite operation
5
Word from the Cloisters
6
Church from the 1950s receives £1 million government grant for new roof
FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK