Some supporters of the bill are now arguing that if it is not passed, the Lords will have “failed in its duty”. In fact, the constitutional duty of the House of Lords is precisely to scrutinise legislation, test assumptions and reject bills whose foundations are unclear or unsound. Passing a bill whose essential nature remains opaque would not fulfil that duty; it would abandon it.
Get Instant Access
Register for free to read this article in full
Subscribe for unlimited access
From just £37.50 quarterly
Print copy of The Tablet delivered directly to your door.
Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
Access to the weekly digital copy of The Tablet.
Full access to The Tablet’s archive – over 180 years of back issues.

Already a subscriber? Login

MOST READ ARTICLES
1
Leo pleas for besieged Ukrainian town in call with Putin
2
Under endless skies
3
Battling confession fatigue
4
Restless statelessness
5
Pope Leo thanks staff at Mass in Gemelli Hospital
6
Study finds German dioceses failed to guard against spiritual abuse in lay groups
FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK