The British government has failed to offer any coherent explanation of its intention to increase its stockpile of nuclear warheads by 40 per cent.

The British government has failed to offer any coherent explanation of its intention to increase its stockpile of nuclear warheads by 40 per cent. And this omission relates to the broader issue: why it is thought necessary that Britain should have nuclear weapons at all. Two comprehensive statements have just been published, one on foreign policy and one on defence policy, and both of them treat the answer as so obvious that it does not need stating.

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that there is another reason – far from being obvious, the argument does not exist. The Emperor, in other words, has no clothes. There is a political consensus that criticising Britain’s nuclear weapons programme would be disloyal. Yet it is an open secret that even in the defence establishment, no strategic military purpose behind Britain’s possession of nuclear weapons can be discerned. Neither of the two government policy statements even attempts to do so.

Get Instant Access

Continue Reading

Register for free to read this article in full

REGISTER

Subscribe for unlimited access

SUBSCRIBE NOW

From just £37.50 quarterly

  Print copy of The Tablet delivered directly to your door.
  Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
  Access to the weekly digital copy of The Tablet.
  Full access to The Tablet’s archive – over 180 years of back issues.

Already a subscriber? Login