- Wanted: a shepherd for the Windy City
One of the most important sees in the United States, Chicago, has to be filled, after Cardinal Francis George declared his wish to resign on the grounds of age and ill-health
- Home News
- World News
- Parish Practice
- Letters Extra
- The living Spirit
- French cardinal calls for solidarity of ‘flesh and blood’ with Iraqi Christians as he arrives in Kurdistan
- Welby urges Palestinians and Israelis to abandon 'self-defeating' violence that could lead to 'greater disaster'
- German bishops: Churches share blame for Europe’s slide into First World War
- Pope Francis and WEA exchange apologies for Churches' past mistreatment of each other
Traditional “Victorian” expectations of family life should give way to a much greater understanding of those with “patchwork” families or who live on their own, a leading lay Catholic academic has said.
Professor Werner G. Jeanrond, Master of St Benet’s Hall, Oxford, has attacked “moralising” church statements on family values and said the synod on the family in October promises to take a fresh look at “all areas of human relationships”.
In a statement, Professor Jeanrond, who studied under Fr Josef Ratzinger, the future Pope Benedict XVI, said: “Current references to the ‘nuclear family’ as the basic cell of church and society would not have been understandable to people in the early Church or in early modern Europe.”
Speaking of one-parent households that are not mentioned in church statements, Professor Jeanrond said: “Should we not understand the entire Church as God’s family and thus widen the perspective even further beyond any unholy and reductionist image of the nuclear family?”
The Professor went on to suggest that Jesus himself had “a sort of holy patchwork family” that “does not correspond to traditionalist Victorian, Vatican or Bismarckian expectations of family life”.
He added: “The forthcoming Synod in Rome promises to reflect much more critically and self-critically on all areas of human relationships, and especially on the family and on so-called family values.”