- Wanted: a shepherd for the Windy City
One of the most important sees in the United States, Chicago, has to be filled, after Cardinal Francis George declared his wish to resign on the grounds of age and ill-health
- Home News
- World News
- Parish Practice
- Letters Extra
- The living Spirit
- Hundreds march to demand Government action on cleansing of northern Iraq's Christians
- Five die in attack after makeshift bomb thrown into Catholic church in Nigerian city of Kano
- Head of London Oratory rejects charge of white middle-class bias in admissions policy
- Catholic author Stratford Caldecott to be buried alongside Tolkien who inspired his conversion
A Catholic newspaper in South Africa has published an editorial condemning legislation against homosexuals in some African countries that has been supported by the Churches there.
The Southern Cross, a weekly promoted by the Southern African Catholic Bishops' Conference, said on 29 January that new legislation in Nigeria and Uganda, and similar proposals in Cameroon and Tanzania, would be used to “persecute people on the basis of their sexual orientation”.
Same sex acts are already illegal in most African countries, but the Southern Cross calls upon the bishops of Africa “to stand with the powerless” and “sound the alarm at the advance throughout Africa of draconian legislation aimed at criminalising homosexuals”.
However, Nigeria’s Catholic bishops issued a statement welcoming Nigeria’s Same Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act 2013, after President Goodluck Jonathan endorsed the new law in January, that outlaws same-sex marriages and public shows of same-sex affection. Those who go to gay clubs in Nigeria now face 10 years in jail and same-sex couples could face up to 14 years in prison.
In December, Ugandan MPs passed a bill increasing sentences for homosexual acts to life in jail and making it punishable by a prison term not to report gay people. The controversial legislation has yet to be signed into law by the Ugandan president Yoweri Museveni. Uganda’s Catholic bishops have been ambivalent about the bill, sometimes supporting it, sometimes speaking tentatively against it.