02 October 2014, The Tablet

Family values the Church can learn


At least in the West, expectations are high that the extraordinary synod of bishops which Pope Francis will open in Rome tomorrow will move the Catholic Church in a more liberal direction on a range of issues, not least regarding divorce and remarriage. It is by no means a foregone conclusion, however: the more closely the bishops in synod study the issue, the more difficult they are likely to find it. Pope Francis clearly favours an outcome which will display God’s mercy rather than a harsh and unforgiving judgement. This could modify, or even remove altogether, the prohibition the Catholic Church has traditionally applied to divorced and remarried Catholics receiving Holy Communion. He will find that the principal obstacle to such movement is the formidable figure of his predecessor, Pope St John Paul II, who plainly intended, in his apostolic exhortation Familiaris Consortio of 1981, to seal this door once and for all.

He said of such couples: “They are unable to be admitted thereto from the fact that their state and condition of life objectively contradict that union of love between Christ and the Church which is signified and effected by the Eucharist.” He emphasised the close theological parallel between Jesus Christ’s indissoluble union with the Church, symbolised in the Eucharist, and the indissoluble union of two baptised people who are bound together by the Sacrament of Matrimony - to such an extent that to deny the second would be to deny the first. This is a very tight knot, which will be hard to unpick.

But the connection between Christ’s love for the Church and the love of two people in marriage is still only a metaphor, albeit one raised by St John Paul II almost to the status of fundamental dogma. There are other powerful metaphors available which suggest a different outcome. One is of the Church as a mother; another, related, is of the Church as a family. Mother Church is a merciful Church, for the metaphor refers to the unconditional love of a parent for her children. Parents know that children disobey and disappoint, but they also understand how important it is for the child to know it is loved regardless. Unconditional love, the love of a mother for her child, is merciful love.

The bond within loving families is of this unconditional kind. A family member who has strayed from the straight and narrow will not be excluded from that family's dining table because of it, and will certainly not be told to sit in a corner and imagine what the food would be like if only they were allowed to taste it – which, under the name of “spiritual communion”, is the best the Church currently offers to those who are divorced and married if they want to join the rest of the Catholic “family” round the Lord's table at Mass. If families can embrace their own members who break the rules, especially those whose situation is no fault of their own, how can the Church, which also talks of itself as a family, do any less? The Church likes to lecture people on how to conduct their family lives; but there is a lesson here about how to love unconditionally that the Church can learn from real families – who do it all the time.




What do you think?

 

You can post as a subscriber user...

User Comments (3)

Comment by: Shirley
Posted: 07/10/2014 05:49:06

What is it about the Hierarchy of the Church that they want to hoodwink and Faithful? It was the Council of Florence in the 15th century that declared the eucharist to be a sacrament and therefore a part of Canon Law. This is Middle Ages thinking and instead of doing what all laws do, update to accommodate changing community behaviour and processes, the Church clings on to its "traditions", such as this particular regulation relating to the eucharist. As we all know, tradition isn't the answer to entering the Kingdom of God. What is essential for entering such kingdom is the instruction from Christ, himself, to love one another. Intellectual pragmatism and manmade dogma defy Christ's instructions and until we admit to the Table our alienated brethren and stop this dreadful hypocritical discrimination, the church pews will get emptier and the alienation of the young will become more pronounced. The people, God's people are speaking, and his servants are not listening.

Comment by: Timbo
Posted: 05/10/2014 23:02:02

Treat the results of the Tablet online survey on the family with caution. It has been hijacked by a right-wing American blog and, following their priest blogger's suggestions, always tries to skew surveys such as these.

Comment by: michaelpoconnor@optusnet.com.au
Posted: 04/10/2014 03:48:58

A family member who has strayed excludes him\herself from the family’s dining table while straying. The younger son excluded himself from the father’s table while living the life he pleased. Taking his place at table required turning back. The older son could exclude himself also. To take his place at that same family table he had to forgive, and embrace the restoration of the relationship. Eating the father’s food without loving and talking to one another is unimaginable.
What are the implications for the Father’s son and daughter (husband and wife) who want to be dining with the Father, but not one with the other – even if the Father and the whole family would dearly love them to?

  Loading ...
Get Instant Access
Subscribe to The Tablet for just £7.99

Subscribe today to take advantage of our introductory offers and enjoy 30 days' access for just £7.99