Blogs > Roll out of 'academisation' of state schools is anti-local councils - or just plain barmy

02 April 2016 | by Clifford Longley

Roll out of 'academisation' of state schools is anti-local councils - or just plain barmy

No evidence to suggest that current system has been failing

The Conservatives' insistence that all state schools should become "academies" - self-governing institutions funded directly by central Government - has only one rational explanation. Otherwise it is plain barmy. Ministers must have decided that local councils are the real obstacles to good education. So take them out of the equation and all will be well.

For more than a century local authorities, answerable to locally-elected councillors, have been the main providers of primary and secondary education for children below and above 11. The 1944 Education Act finally brought church schools, Catholic and Church of England, which together make up roughly a third of the total, into the same system, making it more or less universal.

There is one fundamental flaw in the theory that local authorities are holding back good schools. There is no evidence for it. Teachers who mark pupils' maths homework sometimes write, "show your working" at the bottom of the page, meaning they cannot tell whether the answer, right or wrong, is sheer guesswork unless they know how the pupil arrived at it. If wrong, they cannot see how the mistake arose and therefore cannot correct it. The problem with the "academy revolution" the Government described in its recent White Paper is that it has given what it thinks is the answer, but hasn't said how it arrived at it.

In fact the total absence of evidence that "academisation" works suggests that there is no working out to reveal. This is just guesswork. And the odds are it's plain wrong. Numerous existing academies, already outside the local authority system,  have been failing to provide anything like an adequate education. The Government's hope appears to be that schools that become academies, as all of them must be by 2020, will link themselves into groups. These "chains" of academies, says the theory, will naturally tend to foster good practice and drive out bad, the best inspiring the worst to do better.

But surely the opposite is just as likely, the bad dragging down the good. There is no sign of any mechanism that would prevent the ratchet running the wrong way. Parental pressure? But the Government is proposing to abolish the role of parent governors in school governance once they become academies. And if the influence of successful neighbouring schools is so valuable to others who are not so good, why is this effect not apparent under the present arrangement? Schools under a local education authority are virtually in a chain already. Over the decades they have perfected their own combination of competition and cooperation, for the greater good. Where gaps in provision appear, for instance over children with special needs or severe behavioural problems, local authorities have stepped in to provide solutions covering several school catchment areas, or for whole boroughs. 

The Government's view is that local authorities "interfere" to prevent what head teachers and their staff would otherwise want to do. But again, where is the evidence? Where the protests at this alleged interference from heads themselves? Or from classroom teachers? All the teachers' unions are utterly against these proposals. And among those most indignant about the proposed changes are Conservative-led local education authorities, who are mightily offended at being told they are part of the problem. Many of them run excellent schools. They ask the pertinent question - if it ain't broke, why fix it?

The proposed removal of parent governors is a give-away of what the Government really thinks. The model it has in mind for academies is the public limited company, whose directors bring various technical skills to the PLC boardroom. You don't put customers in charge of production, so get rid of parent governors. The boards who will run academies will be made up mainly of local businessmen or similar trades such as accountants. The emphasis, obviously, will be on efficiency and results (in effect, the profits) - but only those that can be measured. The broader purposes of education, such as character development or culture transmission, will be below the bean-counters' radar. To the Tory mind, it seems, the model citizen we all must emulate, the person our children must be educated to become, is the successful local entrepreneur. A nation of small shopkeepers. Small shopkeepers are fine people, but few of them would want to be regarded as role models for the whole society.

An education system is a cultural vehicle that transmits the values and traditions of one generation to the next - it is, in its essentials, conservative. You don't start again from Year Zero; you draw on past experience of those who have gone before, which you modify as necessary. How to teach is a skill developed over generations. What is happening here is the commodification and marketisation of that skill, as something to be bought and sold. This is the explanation for the otherwise baffling fact that certain academy heads have been awarded salaries way above that paid to the Prime Minister.

Labour's leader Jeremy Corbyn was surely missing the point when he told the National Union of Teachers that what was afoot here was "asset stripping" of educational facilities by business, looking to make a profit out of them. It is worse than that. This is values-stripping - educational reductionism. For a Conservative Government, it is utterly unconservative. And it is likely to be gravely harmful to the common good. 



Follow all the latest news and events from the Catholic world via The Tablet's Twitter feed @the_tablet

Or you can join in the debate at our community page on Facebook

Share this story

Article List

Post a Comment

You can post as a subscriber user ...

User Comments (8)

Comment by: Mark godswin
Posted: 07/09/2016 04:56:09
Me and my ex-wife at all times have always tried to stay friendly over again after our divorce which occurred in early September. But Dr alexzander you are not going to believe this. she is back!!! Yes, she really came back in 24 hours just as you guaranteed Sir. Now I'm fully persuaded that you are a legit and authentic spell caster and your web site is the best I have ever come across. This is so mind-boggling for me. Emily is back!!! I haven't by any means experienced something like this before. Thank you so much Dr alexzander. I never expected such a result. dream come true. wow! You were so kind with me. “And may your kindness float back to you like ripples that float back to sea shore”. Thank you Sir for your precious help. I have never been so happy in my life like the way I am today. You are a genuine spirit and you will never be forgotten for making me a fulfilled man once again.. You are my hero.. The kids are overjoyed to have their mother come back home for good. so i promise to use this outreach to share his good news to the world and let them know of Dr alexzander the great spell caster that saved my marriage. you can get in contact with him through his email address or web site below. or
Comment by: Keller
Posted: 06/08/2016 15:02:44

My lover left me in 2 years ago. he did not contact me, wouldn’t answer my calls and emails, During this period I contacted many casters without results. . But I never lost hope until i got to meet this powerful caster manifestspellcast@ (yahoo). com and he did the most wonderful spell for me and after 3 days everything changed, my lover came back, his love spell works fast even in the most complex circumstances, I am recommending his love spell to every couple who wants to get back together, I can say Dr Manifest possessed all the qualities you want if you want to get your lover back, it was like a dream to me, he will solve your relationship problem.
Comment by: Mike
Posted: 29/07/2016 15:12:15
Surely the reason for academisation is that academy chains will be easy to completely privatise into the hands of corporations.
Comment by: Sue
Posted: 17/07/2016 10:12:03
OMG! Thank you so much Dr. Trust for restoring back my Broken marriage for 4 years of total separation with my lovely husband cos of her mistress who use a spell on him to abandoned me and our kids. i have contacted so many casters online several times but be scammed. i saw a testimony on the internet of one Juliana testifying of your good work, i contacted you which you assured me just 48 hours for an instant result. Sir just same 48 hours as you promise my husband came back home begging for forgiveness to love and cherish i and the kids forever, am so happy and thankful to you Dr. Trust,,,I am So Happy and Excited because as i am writing this Testimony, My husband is madly in love with me again. If there is any body Out there who is in Difficulties and need help should kindly Contact Dr. Trust on His Email ID and he is Ready to Help you no matter the Situation, ( or call +2348156885231) Web
Comment by: Karen Lola
Posted: 18/06/2016 06:01:37
Am Karen Lola from Scotland. I was having serious relationship problems with my boyfriend and it had resulted in him moving out to his friend’s apartment. Everything got worse because he started going to bars and strip clubs frequently with his friend, getting drunk and passing out. He always threatens me on phone whenever I call him because of all the bad advises that his friend has given him. I really love him and we had been dating for 8 years which gave us a beautiful daughter. I had also lost a lot of money on therapists until I was introduced to Dr. Trust by a friend whom he helped to marry her childhood boyfriend; this gave me total confidence and strength to get him back. I did all he asked and after 48 hours my boyfriend called me and rushed back home, things just changed between us emotionally. He has a job and stopped drinking and keeping irrelevant friends. It’s a miracle I never believed was possible because I had lost all hope until I found Dr.Trust. So that’s why I promised to share my testimony all over the universe. All thanks goes to Dr.Trust for the excessive work that he has done for me. Below is the email address in situation you are undergoing a heart break, and I assure you that as he has done mine for me, he will definitely help you too. or call him +2348156885231
Posted: 11/06/2016 04:37:29
Hi friends getting your ex back now and saving your marriage from a divorce or breakup! am ELIZABETH STRONG i want to share a live testimony on how Dr Ewan was able to bring my husband back to me, myself and my husband were on a serious breakup, even before then we were always quarreling fighting and doing different ungodly My husband packed his things out of the house and we had to live in different area, despite all this i was looking for a way to re_unite with my husband, not until i met Dr Ewan the great spell caster who was able to bring my husband back home, and he assured me that my husband will come back to me within 48hours hours after he has finish the preparation of the love am very glade today to tell the world that Doctor Ewan is truly a man of his word because my husband came back to me and we settled differences my family is back again and we are happy living fine and healthy, with Dr Ewan all my dream came through in re_uniting my marriage, friends in case you need the help of Dr Ewan kindly mail him on( or call him on+2347052958531, Sir i will forever recommend you!!!
Comment by: any one will do
Posted: 29/04/2016 16:03:53
I am a governor of an inner London RC primary school and would be interested to know from Clifford Longley or any of your readers what powers a RC diocese has simply to decree - without the agreement necessarily of the governors - that all RC schools in the diocese become members of a Multi Academy Chain

Answers on a postcard, please !
Comment by: John C
Posted: 04/04/2016 18:55:20
This is an extraordinary policy. The much vaunted freedoms that academies supposedly enjoy are illusory: with Ofsted ever present to police orthodoxy no academy is going to risk ditching the national curriculum or declaring UDI over term dates. Catholic schools already have latitude over term dates: how many have term dates radically different from their community school neighbours? We are told to look forward to efficiency savings from sharing resources and staff: but if there is any substance to these they are most likely to be achieved in a close geographical grouping such as a single Local Authority. Most academy chains are already so far flung that efficiency savings are hard to come by. The policy - like the reorganisation of the Health Service after 2010 - was not in the Conservatives' manifesto and has been adopted on no other grounds than ideology, and if this is really about Education why was it announced in The Budget? Ten days earlier Nicky Morgan addressed a conference and seemed unaware the announcement was coming.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign Up

Latest Issue
Digital/PDF Version

PDF version (iPad-friendly)

Previous Issues
Tablet Subscription

Manage my subcription here