I have three questions regarding “Bishops must listen and lead” (Tablet editorial, 25 April). First, what is the theological basis for Cardinal Vincent Nichols’s opinion that “divorced and remarried Catholics might be readmitted to the sacraments after a long and demanding penitential pathway”?
Similarly, what is theological basis for Canadian Cardinal Archbishop Thomas Collins’s reported (June 25, 2014) opinion that “One thing that would help would be if all of us realised that receiving Communion is not obligatory at Mass … if there were less pressure for everyone to receive Communion, 'it would be some help to those who are not in a position to do so’”?
Surely the Eucharist is a primary source of divine support, as people struggle in their faith and secular journeys. Second, “What would Jesus do?” The Gospels’ clear message is that, with outstretched arms, Jesus would welcome even “Catholics in irregular marriages after divorce”.
Finally, how would bishops and clergy fare if subjected to the level of scrutiny exercised over divorced Catholics? Many Church leaders are insensitive to the pain experienced by separating and divorcing couples: divorcees are often innocent victims (i.e., they are unwillingly abandoned); many leave their marriage out of necessity (e.g., they are victims of abuse); others are simply unable to cope with the psychological and other demands of their marriage.
The Church's Marriage Tribunal (annulment) process is not as benign a solution as might be imagined: it is likely to reinforce an inherent sense of failure and guilt; it frequently involves negotiations with ex-partners, interactions that are usually stressful and even volatile; finally, its premise of "nullity" is a legalistic mystery to most people.
Michael Goodstadt Ph.D., C.Psych., Toronto, Canada
Loading ...
