Intellectual freedom is one of the most contentious topics facing students and academics alike. Susan Ostermann, a professor at the university of Notre Dame, Indiana, who is an advocate of abortion rights, recently withdrew from accepting the offer of a more senior appointment after several bishops intervened.
“It has become clear that there is work to do at Notre Dame to build a community where a variety of voices can flourish.” Should there be limits to what can be said by teachers and students in the lecture theatre? Could teaching – and learning – be hemmed in by constraints on the discussion of controversial topics? Is censorship – or self-censorship – a more serious issue than universities are willing to admit? These questions become more complicated when we ask: what, exactly, does “academic freedom” mean in the context of a Catholic university?
Get Instant Access
Register for free to read this article in full
Subscribe for unlimited access
From just £37.50 quarterly
Print copy of The Tablet delivered directly to your door.
Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
Access to the weekly digital copy of The Tablet.
Full access to The Tablet’s archive – over 180 years of back issues.

Already a subscriber? Login

MOST READ ARTICLES
1
Church warns Zambian government against division after archbishop’s arrest
2
Breaking up … for now
3
A craving for beauty
4
The technological paradigm, AI and the human person
5
Bishops demand security investment to promote ‘common good’ in Nigeria
6
Rival church occupies Kyiv monastery in latest blow to Moscow-linked Orthodox
FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK