Some time in the last century, probably towards the end of the 1970s, I remember learning with surprise about the establishment of a group of wise heads within the operation of 10 Downing Street to deal with what was then termed “industrial adjustment”. Someone had clocked the fact that the country’s traditional industries – notably manufacturing, and particularly in the north of England – were in a state of serious decline and had apparently decided that perhaps the government should be giving some thought to what happened next.
My surprise – and the reason I even remember this today – was because I was genuinely startled to learn that someone, somewhere had not already been bending considerable attention to an issue which was obvious even then to a know-nothing, two-bit kid political reporter who talked to MPs about what was happening in their constituencies and got about a bit at by-elections. I thought that was what governments did. I thought it was why we put them there: to think about what happened next, to work out what to do about all the things that were too difficult for the rest of us because we couldn’t do anything about it anyway – while they could, of course, because they were the government. Well, I was very young.
Get Instant Access
Register for free to read this article in full
Subscribe for unlimited access
From just £37.50 quarterly
Print copy of The Tablet delivered directly to your door.
Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
Access to the weekly digital copy of The Tablet.
Full access to The Tablet’s archive – over 180 years of back issues.

Already a subscriber? Login

MOST READ ARTICLES
1
Archbishop of Cardiff-Menevia meets with other worldwide Catholic Church leaders to discuss liturgy
2
Let there be light
3
World Humanitarian Day: aid workers face a ‘crisis of protection’
4
Ruling allows French private hospitals limited exemption from assisted suicide
5
A tract for our times
6
Letters to the Editor of The Tablet
FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK