27 July 2016, The Tablet

Ideas of a Catholic university

by Clare Watkins

Future of Heythrop College

 

A pastoral theologian with experience of both Heythrop College and Roehampton University reflects on the meaning of Catholic education after the failure of their partnership

Hope has two beautiful daughters. Their names are anger and courage.” So wrote St Augustine. As someone temperamentally unfamiliar with those feelings, I’ve been startled by the emergence of both, whenever anyone talks to me about the now apparently failed partnership between Heythrop College and the University of Roehampton. More troubling, I find the feeling of anger focused (perhaps mistakenly) on the pastors of the Church who appear responsible for blocking the decision. Encouraged by the words of St Augustine, I want try to express this anger in ways rooted in that great theological virtue of hope.

It is difficult to know where to begin making sense of what has happened, largely because of a lack of transparency regarding the place of our own bishops in the decisions. So, what I cannot do is respond in any informed way to what exactly has happened. All I can offer are reflections on what the failure of the Heythrop/Roehampton partnership means for us as a Catholic community. My basic thought is: we are on the edge of a calamitous diminishment of Catholic intellectual life, just at a time when we need it most.


Get Instant Access

Continue Reading


Register for free to read this article in full


Subscribe for unlimited access

From just £30 quarterly

  Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
  The full weekly edition in print and digital including our 179 years archive.
  PDF version to view on iPad, iPhone or computer.

Already a subscriber? Login



User Comments (1)

Comment by: Speighdd
Posted: 31/07/2016 22:54:19
Clare Watkins rightly identifies the basic problem behind the current threat to Heythrop College, as being what academic Catholicism is supposed to be; and she rightly concludes, from the universality implied in the word ‘Catholic’, that it must cross-fertilize with all research findings, religiously or secularly inspired, supportive of, or opposed to, its own theological and philosophical tradition. On the other hand she has not recognised the equally important implication of ‘academic catholicity’, that, while the academic enterprise is a search for truth, it is so only up to the point beyond which each case of the truth is progressively discovered and then spelled out. The need for caution, however, in recognising when that point is reached, has so obsessed western culture that it sees education exclusively as questioning, answers as purely provisional, and there being no such thing as THE truth. Clare Watkins’ apparent sharing of that obsession would explain her view of Catholic identity as “fraught”, and whatever share Heythrop and Roehamption have in it, as the likely reason for their inability to show the bishops that their partnership would have been Catholic enough.