31 March 2016, The Tablet

Euro truths and malign fantasies


Arguments for and against Britain leaving the European Union have escalated in recent weeks, particularly among Conservative politicians. So why put them to a public vote at all?

Why have a referendum at all?  What makes British membership of the European Union an issue different from others that are no less significant for the constitution, security and international involvement of our country? Why not a referendum on our membership of Nato, or our maintenance of a nuclear deterrent? Why not ask the people whether they wish to continue being ruled by a hereditary monarch? Or whether England should have a parliament separate from that of the United Kingdom?

On none of these vital matters has there ever been the direct consultation that the Eurosceptics say their obsession deserves, while our signature of the Treaty of Rome has already been the subject of a referendum in 1975, which Margaret Thatcher, then Leader of the Opposition, said would settle the matter once and for all. Why on earth are we now having another?

Get Instant Access

Continue Reading

Register for free to read this article in full

Subscribe for unlimited access

From just £21.50 quarterly

  Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
  The full weekly edition in print and digital including our 179 years archive.
  PDF version to view on iPad, iPhone or computer.

Already a subscriber? Login

User Comments (1)

Comment by: Claude Kauffmann
Posted: 06/04/2016 13:04:07
If the United Kingdom were a ship, and Cameron its captain, his action in calling the Referendum would constitute Barratry!