The wonderful excitement about Pluto, visited by the New Horizons spacecraft this month, has resurrected the old issue of defining a “planet”. But why? Most people approaching this question have one clear goal: they want Pluto to be a planet with a definition clear and simple – “A planet is one of the bodies that I was taught was a planet when I was a child.” Of course, such a definition is useless for any other purposes. The International Astronomical Union, which defined Pluto and similar bodies as “dwarf planets” in 2006, needed a definition so it could name such objects and the features on them, to know whose committee and what set of rules will apply. Fifteen years ago, I was involved in a research programme studying the Trans-Neptunian Objec
23 July 2015, The Tablet
Pluto takes a bow
Get Instant Access
Continue Reading
Register for free to read this article in full
Subscribe for unlimited access
From just £30 quarterly
Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
The full weekly edition in print and digital including our 179 years archive.
PDF version to view on iPad, iPhone or computer.
Already a subscriber? Login
User Comments (1)
Couldn't we make Pluto an Honorary Planet? Just to keep the children happy - even if they are 80, like me? :-))