Starving someone to death is not unlawful homicide, according to the United Kingdom Supreme Court, provided it is agreed in advance by doctors and family. This is such an alarming development of the law on a fundamental question of life and death that it ought surely to have been referred to Parliament. Then the whole nation could have taken part in the discussion, and had a say in the outcome through their MPs. The result may have been very different – people usually have a sound instinct about such things. So do popes – in 2004 Pope St John Paul II described what the Supreme Court has now agreed to as “euthanasia by omission”.
Ending medical treatment: Call it by its proper name
Get Instant Access
Register for free to read this article in full
Subscribe for unlimited access
From just £19.99 quarterly
Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
The full weekly edition in print and digital including our 179 years archive.
PDF version to view on iPad, iPhone or computer.
Already a subscriber? Login