15 September 2016, The Tablet

Unanswered questions on 9/11


 

Some years ago, an old friend, a building engineer by profession, pressed upon me a home-made CD-ROM and urged me, as a journalist, to do something with it. It was, he explained, full of documents proving that the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled explosions and not by the impact of a couple of airliners full of aviation fuel.

I put the disc in my filing cabinet and never mentioned it again. I did not think pursuing it would do any good to either of our reputations. Conspiracy theories – even coming from apparently sane, trustworthy people – have always left me cold.

Consequently, I was unimpressed with the early part of 9/11: Truth, Lies and Conspiracies (13 September). It introduced a couple of representatives of the “truther” movement, who have pulled together a number of puzzling anomalies in the official account of the terrorist attacks and used them to argue that there were no attacks at all: instead the towers had been brought down by the United States Government as a pretext for war. The television images we all saw were clever computer graphics.

Get Instant Access

Continue Reading


Register for free to read this article in full


Subscribe for unlimited access

From just £30 quarterly

  Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
  The full weekly edition in print and digital including our 179 years archive.
  PDF version to view on iPad, iPhone or computer.

Already a subscriber? Login