- Grim parody of a golden age
The jihadist group now calling itself the Islamic State, which has terrorised religious minorities in Syria and Iraq, has declared its intention to restore the caliphate. Yet the extremists’ aims are remote from those of earlier Islamic rulers
- Home News
- World News
- Parish Practice
- Letters Extra
- The living Spirit
- US Bishops pour cold water on Ice Bucket Challenge because money could support embryonic stem cell research
- Pope Francis calls parents of American journalist murdered by British jihadist
- Archdiocese wins legal row with Satanists as consecrated host intended for black mass is returned
- Cardinal angers abuse victims by suggesting Church is not responsible for priests’ crimes
- Stop scapegoating Muslims: social disaffection has many causes, and they won’t be solved by blunt Government intervention Francis Davis
- Pope Francis has transformed the Church – it’s time the Church stopped stifling groups who embrace that transformation Chris McDonnell
- Francis' support for Romero cause is exciting because of its urgency - could he be beatified by end of 2015? Julian Filochowski in El Salvador
The Bishop of Shrewsbury has attacked plans to make pre-nuptial agreements legally binding in England and Wales.
Such contracts would rob traditional marriage vows of their meaning, Bishop Mark Davies warned, adding that they effectively require couples to prepare a divorce settlement before their wedding.
Pre-nuptial agreements, which allow unmarried couples to protect some assets against any future divorce settlement, are catching on in the United States, and could become enforceable in England and Wales under new proposals drafted by the Law Commission.
At present pre-nuptial agreements are not legally enforceable in England and Wales but can be taken into consideration during divorce proceedings.
During a Mass at St Columba’s Church in Chester on Saturday for couples celebrating a major wedding anniversary this year, Bishop Davies argued that pre-nuptial contracts make the promise to stay together “till death do we part” a provisional one.
“It is a legal provision which would surely empty the words of the marriage promise for ‘better for worse … to love and to cherish till death do we part’ of all meaning,” he said. “Pre-nuptial agreements would render these promises provisional by the legal preparations which anticipate divorce.”