- Adjust your moral compass
He is the economist credited with having the most influence on the Archbishop of Canterbury. And Paul Dembinski is clear that regulation is not enough to improve banking - a fundamental cultural shift is needed
- Home News
- World News
- Parish Practice
- Letters Extra
- The living Spirit
- Faith leaders praised for unique role in Ebola fight but governments advised to engage them earlier to save lives
- Bishop attacks Cameron’s ‘hostile’ migrant rhetoric as Church ramps up efforts to help those sleeping rough in Calais camps
- Planned Parenthood under spotlight as cardinal laments ‘throwaway culture’
- Cardinal hopes gay Masses can be rolled out throughout Church in England and Wales
- Francis and the Americans – what's happening? Arthur McCaffrey
- The problem for Catholics with the new UN poverty reduction targets Dr Gillian Paterson
- If I reject David Cameron’s values, am I an extremist? Laura Keynes
In a news story published in the 26 July 2014 edition of The Tablet headed “Church builds bridges with abuse survivors”, we referred to a High Court judgment which held that Portsmouth Diocese could be vicariously liable for alleged abuse by its priests.
The story wrongly stated that after the diocese appealed the original decision to the Court of Appeal in 2012 a ruling had been made that the diocese “was liable to pay compensation for both this case and alleged beatings inflicted by a nun”.
We accept that this statement is incorrect and that the Court of Appeal hearing and judgment were concerned only with the preliminary issue of vicarious liability. We further accept that the Court of Appeal did not decide that the diocese was liable to pay compensat ion to the claimant and that the diocese has not paid any compensation to the claimant. We understand that the claimant’s allegations were never adjudicated upon by the court and that she has discontinued her claim.
Accordingly, we apologise to Portsmouth Diocese for the inaccuracy in the story.