- Exodus of biblical proportions
Hounded out of their homes by Islamist violence, Iraqi Christians face what many fear may be their final festive season in the land of their fathers as many prepare for exile
- Home News
- World News
- Parish Practice
- Letters Extra
- The living Spirit
- Midnight Mass: the ritual under threat from drunken yobbos and a drastic shortage of priests
- Iraqi prelate says his London church is treated with 'profound disrespect' by local youths
- Liverpool’s archbishop talks about plans for his diocese, views on the synod and run-ins with Rome in interview
- Francis backs Italy’s bid for 2024 Olympics – though he says he won’t be around to see them
- Why priests are under pressure on Christmas Eve Fr Mark Minihane OSA
- Christmas under curfew in Nigeria Fr John Bakeni
- Francis’ US-Cuba coup demonstrates the Church’s soft power Christopher Lamb
In a news story published in the 26 July 2014 edition of The Tablet headed “Church builds bridges with abuse survivors”, we referred to a High Court judgment which held that Portsmouth Diocese could be vicariously liable for alleged abuse by its priests.
The story wrongly stated that after the diocese appealed the original decision to the Court of Appeal in 2012 a ruling had been made that the diocese “was liable to pay compensation for both this case and alleged beatings inflicted by a nun”.
We accept that this statement is incorrect and that the Court of Appeal hearing and judgment were concerned only with the preliminary issue of vicarious liability. We further accept that the Court of Appeal did not decide that the diocese was liable to pay compensat ion to the claimant and that the diocese has not paid any compensation to the claimant. We understand that the claimant’s allegations were never adjudicated upon by the court and that she has discontinued her claim.
Accordingly, we apologise to Portsmouth Diocese for the inaccuracy in the story.