- ‘Do you hear the cry of the poor?’
The fate of millions of people in this war-ravaged corner of East Africa depends on an uncertain peace agreement signed this week. A former British government minister, just back from visiting refugee projects in the area, assesses the country’s prospects
- Home News
- World News
- Parish Practice
- Letters Extra
- The living Spirit
- New intake of MPs boosts Catholic presence in the House of Commons
- Cardinal Koch praises Pope's fresh approach to ecumenism that 'sets him apart' from predecessors
- Catholic and Christian charities call for immediate end to Israel’s Gaza blockage
- Cardinal Levada, former archbishop of San Francisco, arrested in Hawaii on drunk-driving charge
- Why are the Kenyan bishops being so difficult about vaccine campaigns? Maureen Duggan MD FRCPCH Sheffield
- Catholics should defend trade union freedom and dignity at work Maria Exall
- Better a prenup than a fearful avoidance of marriage Ayesha Vardag
In a news story published in the 26 July 2014 edition of The Tablet headed “Church builds bridges with abuse survivors”, we referred to a High Court judgment which held that Portsmouth Diocese could be vicariously liable for alleged abuse by its priests.
The story wrongly stated that after the diocese appealed the original decision to the Court of Appeal in 2012 a ruling had been made that the diocese “was liable to pay compensation for both this case and alleged beatings inflicted by a nun”.
We accept that this statement is incorrect and that the Court of Appeal hearing and judgment were concerned only with the preliminary issue of vicarious liability. We further accept that the Court of Appeal did not decide that the diocese was liable to pay compensat ion to the claimant and that the diocese has not paid any compensation to the claimant. We understand that the claimant’s allegations were never adjudicated upon by the court and that she has discontinued her claim.
Accordingly, we apologise to Portsmouth Diocese for the inaccuracy in the story.