- The state we’re all in
Popular notions of hard-working families forking out for benefit scroungers are well wide of the mark, argues the author of a new book, which shows that virtually everyone at some point in their lives needs government support
- Home News
- World News
- Parish Practice
- Letters Extra
- The living Spirit
- Heythrop chairman quits as west London's 400-year-old Jesuit college considers its future
- Nichols says Pope Francis appreciates the 'pragmatic minority' temperament of English Catholicism
- Cardinal O’Malley: we need urgent action on convicted Bishop Finn, LCWR probe was 'a disaster' and I'd ordain women
- Limerick diocese's newly formed synod told to forget its 'unusable past'
- I want to see Catholic women ordained bishops – but not into the hierarchy as it is Una Kroll
- A renewed energy about the US Church Fr Tony Flannery
- A new era in Evangelical-Catholic relations Dr Geoff Tunnicliffe
The headmaster of a prominent Catholic secondary school has hit back at a government body’s ruling that found its admissions policy favoured white middle-class pupils.
David McFadden, headmaster of the London Oratory School in Fulham, west London, rejected the Office of the Schools Adjudicator’s decision last week that 105 aspects of its admission arrangements breached the School Admissions Code.
The oversubscribed school uses a point-based admissions system to give priority to pupils who can show evidence of their commitment to Catholicism.
In a letter to parents Mr McFadden said that the school was representative of the Catholic community in London, noting that the complaint originated with the British Humanist Association, which opposed faith schools.
“The school does not seek to become simply a neighbourhood school in one of the more privileged areas of west London but to retain its London-wide mandate for Catholic pupils of Catholic parents for which it was established,” he said.
He said that the school had complied with all previous adjudications about its admissions policy, adding that the governors would take legal advice on the adjudication and decide upon whether to challenge conclusions of the OSA.