- Strangers in a strange land
With the United Kingdom criticised for opting out of a European Union plan to resettle thousands of migrants from Africa and the Middle East, what should be the Christian response to immigration and does Scripture offer any guidance?
- Home News
- World News
- Parish Practice
- Letters Extra
- The living Spirit
- Pope in Latin America: Paraguay hopes Francis will make historic gesture of solidarity during three-nation trip
- Leading Catholics urge Duncan Smith to rethink further cuts ahead of emergency budget
- Anti-government protests ahead of Pope’s visit to South America
- Closure of London's Heythrop College puts Jesuit mission and 91 jobs at risk
- What is going on in Brentwood Diocese? Mike Lee
- What happens when you euthanase the mentally ill Sheila Hollins
- The argument between Greece and Germany is about far more than money Revd Dr Giles Fraser
The headmaster of a prominent Catholic secondary school has hit back at a government body’s ruling that found its admissions policy favoured white middle-class pupils.
David McFadden, headmaster of the London Oratory School in Fulham, west London, rejected the Office of the Schools Adjudicator’s decision last week that 105 aspects of its admission arrangements breached the School Admissions Code.
The oversubscribed school uses a point-based admissions system to give priority to pupils who can show evidence of their commitment to Catholicism.
In a letter to parents Mr McFadden said that the school was representative of the Catholic community in London, noting that the complaint originated with the British Humanist Association, which opposed faith schools.
“The school does not seek to become simply a neighbourhood school in one of the more privileged areas of west London but to retain its London-wide mandate for Catholic pupils of Catholic parents for which it was established,” he said.
He said that the school had complied with all previous adjudications about its admissions policy, adding that the governors would take legal advice on the adjudication and decide upon whether to challenge conclusions of the OSA.