If I understand her correctly, Fiona Lynch (Letters, 10 May) says that talking about mandatory celibacy, in a religious vocation, is like talking about mandatory fidelity in a marriage. I take it to mean that for her the word “mandatory” is unnecessary, contradictory or meaningless in both cases. From the context of her letter, I presume that, by “religious vocation”, she is talking really about priesthood. If so, it seems to me that, in this instance, we should be comparing priesthood and marriage, per se, without bringing in celibacy. Priesthood and marriage are two states, two distinct callings or vocations which are not mutually exclusive. Hence the existence of married priests in our Catholic Church (and indeed in the Anglican Church). Within these two vocatio
15 May 2014, The Tablet
Celibacy not intrinsic to priesthood
Get Instant Access
Continue Reading
Register for free to read this article in full
Subscribe for unlimited access
From just £30 quarterly
Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
The full weekly edition in print and digital including our 179 years archive.
PDF version to view on iPad, iPhone or computer.
Already a subscriber? Login