The battle for the soul of the liturgy26 June 2014 | Comments: 2
Tiernan MacNamara quotes F.M. Cornford's Preface to his translation of Plato's Republic (The Tablet, 21 June). The battle for the soul of liturgical language is far from new. Fifty years ago Archbishop Francis Grimshaw of Birmingham penned a trenchant Preface to the 1964 Small Ritual published as a result of the Vatican II Constitution on the Liturgy.
The Archbishop praises the quality of modern translations from one European language to another and compares such skill with the apparent desire for literal translations in vogue among ecclesiatical translators. The tendency to copy Latin syntax is, he claims, justified by some on the grounds that this is the solemn language of prayer demanded by the majesty of God. Others, he points out, insist that prayer, whether private or public, should be expressed in the simple language of ordinary people.
He suggests that whatever has become the accepted form of address to one whom we respect yet love should be the form to adopt when we speak either to God or about him. Slavish, ad literam translation will not do any more, he says. We must avoid anything that makes the language of prayer unreal. Tiernan MacNamara thinks it's significant that no one is prepared to publicly admit ownership of the present so-called translation. I find it significant that the combined hierarchy of England and Wales are not confident enough to stand up to Roman officialdom in defence of good translation. Where is the Grimshaw of our times? I ask. In the meantime I can only suggest that "we await the blessed hope".
Kevin Hartley, Stourbridge
I am sure the Irish clergy are not alone in wishing for the new translation of the Roman Missal be scrapped. One only has to try and make sense of the Preface to the Eucharistic Prayer for Trinity Sunday to realise that what we now have is not fit for purpose.
Fr Peter M Sharrocks, Stockport
Manage my subcription hereManage
Sign up for our newsletterSign Up