Ritual slaughter vs stunning28 March 2014 | Comments: 0
There is an important omission in James Macintyre's article on Jewish and Muslim slaughter of animals (The Tablet, 15 March). This is that the case for it being more, and not less, humane than pre-stunning, based on close observation of the two methods, not only by Jews and Muslims.
For example, Colin Kenny (Guardian letters, 12 March) describes how his work as a junior technician required him to witness both methods on several occasions, and his conclusion was that it was the Jewish method which enabled the animals to die, to judge from appearances, "cleanly and almost instantly".
Harry Lesser, Bowdon, Cheshire
With shechita and halal slaughter death is swift, with the major blood vessels and windpipe being cut. Pre-stunning is not perfect; only 70 per cent of animals so treated are actually stunned. It is not understood that shechita and halal slaughter are spiritual practices that demand good animal welfare and uphold the sanctity of creation.
Shechita and halal slaughter are important processes within Judaism and Islam. In our time, religious practices are under pressure from a secularising society. It is important that people of religion stand with each other.
Revd Keith Trivasse, Bury, Lancs
Love and laughterPremium
Kung pins hope on FrancisPremium
Don’t trust the EurophilesPremium
Manage my subcription hereManage
Sign up for our newsletterSign Up