- Strangers in a strange land
With the United Kingdom criticised for opting out of a European Union plan to resettle thousands of migrants from Africa and the Middle East, what should be the Christian response to immigration and does Scripture offer any guidance?
- Home News
- World News
- Parish Practice
- Letters Extra
- The living Spirit
- Pope in Latin America: Paraguay hopes Francis will make historic gesture of solidarity during three-nation trip
- Leading Catholics urge Duncan Smith to rethink further cuts ahead of emergency budget
- Anti-government protests ahead of Pope’s visit to South America
- Closure of London's Heythrop College puts Jesuit mission and 91 jobs at risk
- What is going on in Brentwood Diocese? Mike Lee
- What happens when you euthanase the mentally ill Sheila Hollins
- The argument between Greece and Germany is about far more than money Revd Dr Giles Fraser
It is interesting to compare the way parishes are run in different parts of the world. In South Korea, parish councils have been part of the parish structure for decades and it would be most unusual for a new parish priest to come in and simply abolish it, one reason being that he'd then have to do all the work in the parish by himself.
And as for "immoveable" priests, in my diocese a parish priest has a maximum of seven years in any one parish. So while the Korean parish priest certainly rules the roost, the people know that even if he's not changed sooner, he will be a little later.
The parish in which I am presently resident has had 18 parish priests over the past 52 years (average three years per pastor). The obvious disadvantage of this system is that the priest can become pastorally detached, as there is no long-term bonding with his parishioners.
Fr John L Sullivan OSA, Incheon, S Korea