- Now the talking really begins
Pope Francis wanted frankness and openness and that is what he got. But there is also the sense that the real debate in the Church about marriage and families is only just starting
- Home News
- World News
- Parish Practice
- Letters Extra
- The living Spirit
- Pope calls for abolition of death penalty and life sentences and urges Catholics to campaign against them
- Former Irish safeguarding head attacks bishops’ ‘empty gestures’
- Myanmar Church educates voters to ensure credible election
- Vatican says Italian diocese facing investigation over alleged misbehaviour of priests
Do I misunderstand Linda Woodhead's position as being inconsistent when she states ("Stand up for moderation", The Tablet, 12 April) states that “majority opinion is being swamped by small and unrepresentative groups with strongly illiberal agendas” and then interprets her own research in the UK where “only 3.6 per cent of the population hold fundamentalist views and only 7 per cent of Anglicans – far smaller proportions than we have been led to believe”?
What exactly is being “swamped”? It is of importance for me in Kolkata during national election times, when the issue of fundamentalism is an important factor in a country avowedly secular.
Brendan MacCarthaigh, Kolkata, India