We must obey the will of the people ... at least for the moment. But should we respect it, any more than we respect other, self-defeating policies endorsed by majority opinions throughout history? And is there an alternative?
Some years ago I gave a lecture on the history of the small town in southern Poland from which my family hails. At the end a fellow historian in the audience got up and said, in a dismissive tone: “You sound as if you’re lamenting the fall of the Austro-Hungarian empire.” “Of course!” I replied. For all its faults, after all, the empire provided the peoples of east-central Europe with a reasonably decent way to live together, at any rate by comparison with what followed.
After 1918, the “successor states” plunged into ethnocentric squabbling and economic nationalism. Tariff wars, competitive currency devaluations and restrictions on migration, supposedly designed to combat the Great Depression, instead exacerbated its effects. The declared goals were national self-determination and popular sovereignty. Soon those were obliterated and replaced by police states and foreign occupation.
27 July 2016, The Tablet
Ways we’ll live now: should we respect the will of the people, and is there an alternative
History may provide some clues to how we learn to live after the referendum vote to leave the European Union
Get Instant Access
Continue Reading
Register for free to read this article in full
Subscribe for unlimited access
From just £30 quarterly
Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
The full weekly edition in print and digital including our 179 years archive.
PDF version to view on iPad, iPhone or computer.
Already a subscriber? Login
User Comments (2)
I note that Professor Wasserstein is connected with the University of Chicago which gave a home to the Frankfurt School. The pernicious and anti_Christian evil propagated by that institution has done more to destroy the social and cultural fabric of Western society than any battalion of Soviet tanks ever did. The "intellectuals" who formed that socialist subversion group also conspired to overthrow the very democracy that gave them safe haven from Nazi Germany. Perhaps a little gratitude would have been more appropriate?