Features

On the move Premium

16 June 2016 | by Mark Hayes

 

Free movement of citizens within its borders is a mark of the EU’s democratic legitimacy. This in turn has its roots in the dignity and freedom of the individual

Is there not a contradiction deep at the heart of the Brexit campaign? On the one hand, the Leavers rail against the democratic deficit in the European Union (EU); on the other hand – and here they find most of their popular support – they demand an end to the free movement of EU citizens across the borders of member states, or at least of this one. Yet both democracy (which they support) and the free movement of citizens (which they do not) have their roots in the freedom and dignity of the individual human person.

Migration is the most sensitive issue in this referendum campaign, especially so-called “economic” migration. Even if the response of the UK and the EU as a whole to the refugee crisis has been lamentable, few would question the moral legitimacy of the legal right to asylum, though many would say preferably “not in my backyard”. The more difficult issue has been migration within the EU, and what I have not heard from the Remainers (and we are unlikely to) is the positive case for ­“economic” migration. Indeed the word ­“economic” is heavily loaded, as is the usual phrase “the free movement of labour”, as though labour were a commodity no different from goods or money.





Subscribe now and enjoy access to all parts of the tablet website, Including its 175 year archive...
Subscribe


Article List


TABLET WORLD…
Latest Issue

Digital/PDF Version

PDF version (iPad-friendly)

Previous Issues
Latest Tweet
Most Read Articles

Both sides in Amoris Laetitia debate are right, says Cardinal Müller19 October 2017 by Christa Pongratz-Lippitt

Pro Francis theologians start petition in support of Pope following 'filial correction' 18 October 2017 by Christopher Lamb

German bishops abandon controversial Missal translation09 October 2017 by Christa Pongratz-Lippitt

Both sides in Amoris Laetitia debate are right, says Cardinal Müller19 October 2017 by Christa Pongratz-Lippitt

Pro Francis theologians start petition in support of Pope following 'filial correction' 18 October 2017 by Christopher Lamb

German bishops abandon controversial Missal translation09 October 2017 by Christa Pongratz-Lippitt

Changing minds and hearts: the basic moral test of a society and its laws is the treatment of human life at its most vulnerablePremium18 October 2017 by John Wilson

The book of the people: the laity were reading the scriptures before 1517Premium18 October 2017 by Thomas Kaufmann

When realities collide: A pro-life activist suggests a change of direction for those campaigning for the abolition of the Abortion ActPremium18 October 2017 by Rebecca Bratten Weiss

Changing minds and hearts: the basic moral test of a society and its laws is the treatment of human life at its most vulnerablePremium18 October 2017 by John Wilson

The book of the people: the laity were reading the scriptures before 1517Premium18 October 2017 by Thomas Kaufmann

When realities collide: A pro-life activist suggests a change of direction for those campaigning for the abolition of the Abortion ActPremium18 October 2017 by Rebecca Bratten Weiss

Share Us
Tablet Subscription

Manage my subcription here

Manage
Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign Up
Top