01 June 2017, The Tablet

Breakfast means breakfast


The ethical Kitchen

 

In 2016 there were four and a half million children attending state primary schools in the UK, a number that rises year upon year. The Conservatives say the free breakfast scheme they plan to introduce if they are re-elected next week will cost £60 million per year. That is not nearly enough to serve up muesli and a full English five days a week during term time. I have a suspicion that school cooks will not even do porridge – much too Oliver Twist – but will opt instead for low-grade breakfast cereal with milk and sugar. 

Surveys reveal that an alarming proportion of children go to school on an empty stomach. A snack of any kind at the beginning of the day is better than nothing. I support the idea of breakfast clubs. For parents setting off early to work, they provide a settling-down moment for children, and an appealing alternative to what can sometimes be a stressful breakfast at home. If such an option had been available at my children’s school I would have taken it, and, if asked, paid for it. 

But breakfast is breakfast – so use it for what it is: the first fuel injection of the day. No matter how well intentioned the new policy, a primary-school-age child needs more than the empty calories in corn flakes (even when “fortified” with powdered vitamins) in order to concentrate through a long school day.

Get Instant Access

Continue Reading


Register for free to read this article in full


Subscribe for unlimited access

From just £30 quarterly

  Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
  The full weekly edition in print and digital including our 179 years archive.
  PDF version to view on iPad, iPhone or computer.

Already a subscriber? Login