There’s a growing sense that we are witnessing in these days the emergence of a “new” Synod of Bishops. Throughout the many years of following closely the work of this permanent body based in Rome, I’ve never had the sense, until now, that it might finally become the place for open debate and discussion that Paul VI (at least, originally) intended it to be. Allow me to explain. As a Vatican Radio reporter between 1990 and 1999, I personally attended six synods – two ordinary and four special (or continental) assemblies. The long hours spent each day – usually four weeks at a time – as one of the few media observers inside the Synod Hall, led me to form this conclusion: the synod was a rubber-stamping body for policies forwarded by the dominant for
09 November 2013, The Tablet
Letter from Rome
Get Instant Access
Continue Reading
Register for free to read this article in full
Subscribe for unlimited access
From just £30 quarterly
Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
The full weekly edition in print and digital including our 179 years archive.
PDF version to view on iPad, iPhone or computer.
Already a subscriber? Login
User Comments (1)
Regarding the UPDATE: The reaction was to be expected, but it is wrong. Francis did not deny some church leaders covered up abuses. He only recognized the efforts made by the bishops during recent years (AFTER the full extension of the scandal was known). The Pope made additional remarks at St Patrick cathedral.