In this bewildering world, in which barely a week passes without some cruel and bizarre atrocity, it is not surprising that people seek a deeper pattern or meaning in events.
Some turn not to newspapers and television but to the fervid speculations of professional rabble-rousers and internet obsessives. In doing so they often become “conspiracy theorists”, a disparaging term for those who make it a point of honour to take nothing at face value. Typically, conspiracy theorists assert that atrocities were committed not by terrorists or lone fanatics but by those who claim to protect us, using them to impose ever more repressive restrictions on us or to advance secret plans for world domination.
A “conspiracy” is a combination of people intent on evil deeds. The word is first recorded in the fourteenth century, in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Its source is the Latin verb conspirare, “to agree”. In 1997, the OED added an entry on “conspiracy theory”, which it defined as “a belief that some covert but influential agency (typically political in motivation and oppressive in intent) is responsible for an unexplained event”.
18 August 2016, The Tablet
Shadow stories
Get Instant Access
Continue Reading
Register for free to read this article in full
Subscribe for unlimited access
From just £30 quarterly
Complete access to all Tablet website content including all premium content.
The full weekly edition in print and digital including our 179 years archive.
PDF version to view on iPad, iPhone or computer.
Already a subscriber? Login